The amount of animal biomass (excluding people and pets) per unit area.
Used to calculate:wildlife biomass
Varies by: ecosystem
Used | ecosystem | Reference | Location: Ecosystem (study period) |
Value | Units | Notes |
---|
* | Agricultural field / vegetable garden | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / m2 | We have assumed a zero value for this parameter do to a lack of information. |
* | Airfield | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Airport terminal | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Alley | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Apartment building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Beach | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / m2 | We have assumed a zero value for this parameter do to a lack of information. |
* | Bike lane | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Bioswale | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Boulevard (arterial) | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Bridge | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Camp | Burghardt et al. 2009- Impact of Native Plants on Bird and Butterfly Biodiversity in Suburban Landscapes | southeastern Pennsylvania: suburban (2006) | 0.000324 | kg / m2 | We assume the same wildlife biomass density as that of a lawn. This value accounts for avian biomass only. |
* | Cemetery | Burghardt et al. 2009- Impact of Native Plants on Bird and Butterfly Biodiversity in Suburban Landscapes | southeastern Pennsylvania: suburban (2006) | 0.000324 | kg / m2 | We assume the same wildlife biomass density as that of a lawn. This value accounts for avian biomass only. |
* | Cistern / rain barrels | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Cliffs and rock outcrops | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / m2 | We have assumed a zero value for this parameter do to a lack of information. |
* | Cogeneration plant | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Compost bin | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Computer data center | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Cottages / Mobile home | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Deep water estuary | NOAA 2015 Data compilations for primary production, herbivory, decomposition, and export for different types of marine communities, 1962-2002 (NODC Accession 0054500) | Global: deepwater estuary (2015) | 1.76 | g / m2 | using excel spreadsheet from data download for consumption of phytoplankton, microalgal beds, seagrass meadows; extremely low weight value in grams/ m2 the density of the herbivores consuming the plants |
* | Derelict structures | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | g / m2 | |
* | Diesel power plant | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Disturbed Land | Manley et al 1994 Arthropod response to strip disking in old fields... | Mississippi: Old fields (1992-1993) | 5.61 | g / m2 | Total arthropod biomass (g/m2) in control treatments at Copiah County Wildlife Management Area, June - August 1992 |
* | Eelgrass meadow | Nelson & Waaland 1997 Seasonality of eelgrass, epiphyte, and grazer biomass.... | San Juan Islands, Washington: Eelgrass meadows (July 1990 - July 1992) | 1.3 | g / m2 | dry weight of Lacuna snails (eelgrass herbivores) |
* | Elevated train | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Estuary | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / m2 | We have assumed a zero value for this parameter due to a lack of information. |
* | Factory | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Freshwater marsh | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / m2 | We have assumed a zero value for this parameter do to a lack of information. |
* | Fuel storage tank | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Garage | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Gas station | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Geothermal pump | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Graywater recycling | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Greenhouse / vertical farm | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Green roof | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / m2 | We have assumed a zero value for this parameter do to a lack of information. |
* | Hardwood swamp | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / m2 | We have assumed a zero value for this parameter do to a lack of information. |
* | Heavy rail line | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Hemlock – northern hardwood forest | Fisher & Likens 1973 - Energy Flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: An Integrative Approach to Stream Ecosystem Metabolism | Bear Brook, NH: Mature hardwood forest (1968-1970) | 69 | g / m2 | |
Hemlock – northern hardwood forest | Jordan 1971 - A World Pattern in Plant Energetics... | Europe: Hardwood forest () | 5.8 | kg / ha | This value is the sum of the biomass density of mammals (4.5 kg/ha) in a hardwood forest in Czechoslovakia and the biomass of birds (1.3 kg/ha) in a mature mixed hardwood forest in Europe. | |
* | High salt marsh | Teal 1962 Energy Flow in the Salt Marsh Ecosystem of Georgia | Sapelo Island, Georgia: Salt marsh (late 1950s - early 1960s) | 32 | g / m2 | |
* | Highway | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Hospital | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Hotel | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Landfill | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Lawn | Burghardt et al. 2009- Impact of Native Plants on Bird and Butterfly Biodiversity in Suburban Landscapes | southeastern Pennsylvania: suburban (2006) | 0.000324 | kg / m2 | This value accounts for avian biomass only. |
* | Light rail line | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Low salt marsh | Teal 1962 Energy Flow in the Salt Marsh Ecosystem of Georgia | Sapelo Island, Georgia: Salt marsh (late 1950s - early 1960s) | 32 | g / m2 | |
* | Meadow | International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 2012. Arthropods | Global: Temperate Grasslands () | 8121.5 | kg / ha | Includes arthropods, mammals, birds and microbial organisms. |
* | Mixed use: office / residential building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | g / m2 | |
* | Mixed use: restaurant / office building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Mixed use: restaurant / residential building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Mixed use: restaurant / retail building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Mixed use: retail / office building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Mixed use: retail / residential building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Natural gas power plant | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Oak hickory forest | Jordan 1971 - A World Pattern in Plant Energetics... | Europe: Oak forest () | 7.777 | kg / ha | This value is the sum of the biomass of mammal (7.5 kg / ha) in a Oak forest in Europe and the biomass of birds (0.277) in a Oak-hickory forest in Wyoming. |
Oak hickory forest | Beissinger & Osborne 1982 Effects of urbanization on avian community organization | Hueston Woods State Park, Ohio, Site 2: Comprised uniform mature beech-maple forest () | 730.3279 | g / ha | This value represents the avifaunas biomass density of a comprised uniform mature beech-maple forest. We divided the overall wildlife biomass of the forest by the number of hectares in order to get a density for one hectare of the forest. | |
Oak hickory forest | Beissinger & Osborne 1982 Effects of urbanization on avian community organization | Hueston Woods State Park, Ohio, Site 1: Comprised uniform mature beech-maple forest () | 940.348 | g / ha | This value represents the avifaunas biomass density of a comprised uniform mature beech-maple forest. We divided the overall wildlife biomass of the forest by the number of hectares in order to get a density for one hectare of the forest. | |
* | Office building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Orchard | Sullivan et al. 1998- Population dynamics of small mammals in relation to vegetation management in orchard agroecosystems: compensatory responses in abundance and biomass | Summerland, British Columbia, Canada: apple orchard (1983-1986) | 10.28 | kg / ha | This value refers to the observed summertime wildlife biomass density in a five-year-old orchard. |
* | Ornamental garden | Parker & Nilon 2008 Gray squirrel density, habitat suitability, and behavior in urban parks | Federal Hill, Baltimore, Maryland: Urban park (Summer 2004) | 4.6 | kg / ha | Observed density of gray squirrels was 8.5 squirrels per hectare. According to http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sciurus_carolinensis.html the mean biomass of a gray squirrel is 540.33 g. Therefore the observed biomass density was approximately 4.6 kg/ha. |
Ornamental garden | Parker & Nilon 2008 Gray squirrel density, habitat suitability, and behavior in urban parks | Lafayette Park, Washington, D.C.: Urban park (Summer 2004) | 23.9 | kg / ha | Observed density of 44.3 gray squirrels / ha. According to http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Sciurus_carolinensis.html, the mean biomass of a gray squirrel is 540.33 g. The observed density of gray squirrels is therefore approximately 23.9 kg/ha. Lafayette Park is famous in research circles for its extraordinary density of squirrels. | |
* | Parking lot | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Park savanna | Beissinger & Osborne 1982 Effects of urbanization on avian community organization | Site 2, Oxford, Ohio: Residential neighborhood (1976-1982) | 1.03 | kg / m2 | 12,657 g of biomass (birds only) were observed in an area of 6.1 ha, which is equivalent to 2.07 kg/ha convert to m2 = 0.000207 avg. weight of Eastern grey squirrel = 0.58 kg avg. weight of NYC rat = 0.45 kg total = 1.03 kg/m2 |
* | Paved ball field/court | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Pedestrian bridge | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Pedestrian street / plaza | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Permeable pavers | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Photovoltaic panels | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Pier | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Pond | Welch & Ball 1966 - Food Consumption and Production of Pond Fish | Michigan State University Experiment Station, Pond A: Artificial pond (1956-1958) | 8.7 | g / m2 | This value is the beltic biomass of Pond B on 8/8/1957 outside set fish exclosures. |
Pond | Welch & Ball 1966 - Food Consumption and Production of Pond Fish | Michigan State University Experiment Station, Pond A: Artificial pond (1956-1958) | 28 | g / m2 | This value is the beltic biomass of Pond A, Section 1 on 8/29/1957 outside set fish exclosures. | |
* | Public assembly hall | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
Puddles on hardtops | NULL REFERENCE | NULL REFERENCE LOCATON: NULL ECOSYSTEM (NULL STUDY PERIOD) | None | DUMMY UNIT | ||
* | Restaurant | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Retail building | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | School or university | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Sewage treatment plant | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Shrub land | Chew & Chew 1970 - Energy Relationships of the Mammals of a Desert Shrub (Larrea tridentata) Community | San Simon Valley of southeastern Arizon: Desert Shrub () | 1133 | g / ha | This value represents the biomass of all mammal species in the studied plot of the San Simon Valley of southeastern Arizona. |
* | Sidewalk | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Single family home | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Solar energy facility | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Solar heating panels | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Solid waste transfer plant | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Stadium | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Stream | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / m2 | We have assumed a zero value for this parameter do to a lack of information. |
* | Streetcar line | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Street (collector) | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Street trees | Beissinger & Osborne 1982 Effects of urbanization on avian community organization | Site 2, Oxford, Ohio: Residential neighborhood (1976-1982) | 2.07 | kg / ha | 12,657 g of biomass (birds only) were observed in an area of 6.1 ha, which is equivalent to 2.07 kg/ha |
Street trees | Beissinger & Osborne 1982 Effects of urbanization on avian community organization | Site 1, Oxford, Ohio: Residential neighborhood (1976-1982) | 2.53 | kg / ha | 15,445 g of biomass (birds only) were observed in an area of 6.1 ha, which is equivalent to 2.53 kg / ha | |
* | Subway | Assumed | New York City: Mannahatta () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Swimming pool | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Tidal energy facility | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Traffic slowed street | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Trail | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | g / m2 | |
* | Tunnel | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Utility yard | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Warehouse | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / ha | |
* | Waste energy power plant | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Water treatment plant | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Water/wastewater storage tank | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 | |
* | Wind farm | Assumed | New York City: Urban Area () | 0 | kg / m2 |